NumbersWatchdog.com

HomeNumbersChina ImpactNEWS/ARTICLESIpperwash PapersResident's Views

Useful InformationVideo/Audio FilesContact


     
 

Builder sues city for $125K

 
 

Posted By MICHAEL-ALLAN MARION Brantford Expositor May 16 2009

 
 
 

 

A local homebuilder is suing the city for $125,000, claiming he is due tax credits for turning a brownfield site into a housing project.

Mike Quattrociocchi, president of Mayberry Homes, and his wife, Michelle, who runs 1498745 Ontario Ltd., have filed the lawsuit.

In their statement of claim, they contend the city declined to extend all the credits they are due under a brownfield tax incentive program, after they remediated an old railway property on Grand River Avenue, across from Jarvis Street, more than a year ago.

They say city officials gave them wrong information when they purchased the land, on the belief that they would be eligible for credits, which would make the project feasible.

Allegations in the statement of claim have not been proved in court.

The Quattrociocchis say they lost money when they finished the work and were la ter told they weren't eligible.

"The (city) was reckless and negligent," the statement says, because it "owed a duty of care to provide the correct information."

Mike Quattrociocchi said in an interview that filing the lawsuit was a last resor t after talks with staff failed to fix the problem.

"It's the only alternative the city has left me," he said.

City manager John Brown said the city has no comment.

"We can't comment on any matter that is before the courts," he said.

The suit concerns part of the commonly known Dwyer lands, owned by Christine Dwyer, which was on the city's list of designated brownfield sites.

According to the family's business arrangements, it was purchased in sections by Michelle Quattrociocchi's numbered company in 2007 and 2008, then Mike Quattrociocchi and Mayberry, as agent, cleaned up each block and constructed a line of houses.

The Quattrociocchis applied for and received $36,000 in credits for the first phase of the project.

Just before they acquired the second section, the statement says, they consulted city officials and received confirmation that they were eligible for credits again.

The statement says that, at first, city officials were "unsure if the credits would apply to the abundance of concrete found on the property." But later confirmed that the creditis would apply.

After performing the remedial work, the Quattrociocchis applied for credits and sent in their receipts. But in November 2008, they received notification that the second phase wasn't eligible because it did not qualify as a "contaminated site."

Consequently, the statement says the Quattrociocchis experienced damages of $112,000.

"The plaintiffs would not have purchased the lands at the contracted price had they not been advised that the lands were eligible for brownfield credits," the statement says.

The lawsuit is the latest twist in Quattrociocchi's controversial housing project on Grand River Avenue.

The property was the site of Six Nations land protests last year.

Each phase of development also was opposed by local residents and a grassroots group called Keep Our River Public, which is fighting for open space to be preserved along the Grand River.

Quattrociocchi and Dwyer have offered to sell the city parts that still haven't been developed.

Recently, they offered to swap portions that have not been developed for city-owned property near Wayne Gretzky Parkway and Henry Street.

City officials are collecting appraisals for both parcels, for a report to be presented to council soon.

Article ID# 1571034